← Back to context Comment by Ameo 10 hours ago [flagged] 5 comments Ameo Reply mwigdahl 4 hours ago Unfortunately as cost reduction trends to 100%, it comes along with an intrinsic high-pass sarcasm filter. throwaway2027 7 hours ago You would obviously be trading storage for compute and time to retrieve the storage. throwaw12 9 hours ago 100% reduction is impossible for something which should work, because -100% means it is now 0 neonstatic 9 hours ago They were clearly being sarcastic peheje 9 hours ago Reminds me of 'Learning to be me' by Greg Egan
mwigdahl 4 hours ago Unfortunately as cost reduction trends to 100%, it comes along with an intrinsic high-pass sarcasm filter.
throwaway2027 7 hours ago You would obviously be trading storage for compute and time to retrieve the storage.
throwaw12 9 hours ago 100% reduction is impossible for something which should work, because -100% means it is now 0 neonstatic 9 hours ago They were clearly being sarcastic
Unfortunately as cost reduction trends to 100%, it comes along with an intrinsic high-pass sarcasm filter.
You would obviously be trading storage for compute and time to retrieve the storage.
100% reduction is impossible for something which should work, because -100% means it is now 0
They were clearly being sarcastic
Reminds me of 'Learning to be me' by Greg Egan