← Back to context

Comment by radiator

4 days ago

Judging from this very release, where he implemented support for page-level checksums and encryption for LMBD, I assume the author knows a thing or two about encryption. He probably then deemed it unnecessary for this specific website.

Cryptography engineers are not excluded from being lazy sysadmins.

  • What do you mean "lazy"? I thought you said TLS certs were free. Do you mean they cost something after all? Time, for example?

    Anyway, of course in case you feel the website is a risk, you should refrain from using it. Safety comes first.

    • Indeed, there's no need to use the doc website. There's nothing there that isn't embedded in the LMDB source code. All of the docs are generated from doxygen comments in the source.