Comment by rationalist
4 days ago
It's a shame it costs more. I'm sure there are people who would like the non-wireless option, but would rather "save" $400.
4 days ago
It's a shame it costs more. I'm sure there are people who would like the non-wireless option, but would rather "save" $400.
Economies of (lack of) scale.
Unless you need it for a high security environment that's limited to civilian procurement, why? I'm struggling to see a use case beyond that
Less cognitive and screen clutter for one. Less things to break and cause unintended consequences.
In other products: less weight, smaller size.