Comment by drdexebtjl
1 month ago
> 4. Use separate bouncers for each application that might be different (extension of #1)
I wonder if clients send something equivalent to a User-Agent, such that the connection pooler could assign them to different pools automatically.
This exists, its called a user. You just use different database users for this.
I was thinking of something that only exists at the pool level.
Every new version of your app has the potential to change behavior in a way that would affect the previous version if the connection was recycled during a progressive rollout.
But I don’t think I would want to create a real database user for every version of the app.
I suppose the connection pooler could map versioned users to the same real user, and use separate pools, but a dedicated UA field is probably better.
> But I don’t think I would want to create a real database user for every version of the app.
Why not? Database users are (usually) not expensive, and with groups you can give access to a group you just add the user to.
Adding this logic to the connection pooler seems more complicated.
1 reply →
Can also use different database names since pgbouncer lets you remap that