← Back to context Comment by mjg59 10 hours ago Isn't that lower than a purely resistive heater? 8 comments mjg59 Reply Bendy 10 hours ago Only if the resistive heater in question is DC or AC with reactive power compensation ruperthair 9 hours ago A purely resistive heater, by definition, has no reactive component so there's no reactive power considerer.The 0.1% mentioned might be the light that the project produces. choo-t 8 hours ago Assuming you're not in an endless vacuum, the light will also become heat. 5 replies →
Bendy 10 hours ago Only if the resistive heater in question is DC or AC with reactive power compensation ruperthair 9 hours ago A purely resistive heater, by definition, has no reactive component so there's no reactive power considerer.The 0.1% mentioned might be the light that the project produces. choo-t 8 hours ago Assuming you're not in an endless vacuum, the light will also become heat. 5 replies →
ruperthair 9 hours ago A purely resistive heater, by definition, has no reactive component so there's no reactive power considerer.The 0.1% mentioned might be the light that the project produces. choo-t 8 hours ago Assuming you're not in an endless vacuum, the light will also become heat. 5 replies →
choo-t 8 hours ago Assuming you're not in an endless vacuum, the light will also become heat. 5 replies →
Only if the resistive heater in question is DC or AC with reactive power compensation
A purely resistive heater, by definition, has no reactive component so there's no reactive power considerer.
The 0.1% mentioned might be the light that the project produces.
Assuming you're not in an endless vacuum, the light will also become heat.
5 replies →