Comment by wat10000
2 days ago
You'd care if you had a human bookkeeper and you were considering replacing them with this company's AI bookkeeper.
2 days ago
You'd care if you had a human bookkeeper and you were considering replacing them with this company's AI bookkeeper.
Why would I want both a less accurate book keeper and to incur all of the liability of doing the books myself?!
It's not less accurate. As commented above, the control knew they were being tested against the machine, so made sure to be super careful.
In everyday life the human is less careful, and the machine costs 1% of the human.
Because it's way cheaper. Not saying it's a good tradeoff, but that appears to be their pitch.
Presumably your current book keeper is not your slave, and you have to pay them...
...again: liability is the key issue. Cost savings a not exactly an isolated issue here.
6 replies →