← Back to context

Comment by Flere-Imsaho

2 days ago

Here in the UK, a large proportion of the population still think the EU is a good idea... Despite all the evidence proving otherwise.

Did leaving the EU actually fixed anything for the UK?

  • > Did leaving the EU actually fixed anything for the UK?

    Yes - it fixed the attribution of our problems. Politicians, leaders, judges, etc will find it harder to "blame the EU" - when then blame is squarely on them.

    This will then have an effect during voting.

I know I do.

I think the main purpose of the EU is to prevent wars between European states by providing a forum for compromise and cooperation.

I’d say it’s succeeded in that nicely since its founding. Not one war between member states despite ongoing disputes.

Seems like a very good idea.

I hate this law though, it’s undemocratic.

  • Okay, but couldn’t a more transparent and accountable structure have accomplished the same result? Why do you need a system with seven different bodies, more than one of which can make what’s effectively laws?

    For example, why have an elected parliament that can’t even originate law, but an unelected commission that can make regulations that are effectively laws?

    • That's implementation details though; one can absolutely think that "EU is a good idea" and "specific EU systems need improving" simultaneously, without contradiction.

      It's like thinking "I like Canada and am a proud Canadian, though I think there's still a lot of inequality and many policies can be improved upon and we can certainly be more efficient".

      4 replies →

    • >Why do you need a system with seven different bodies more than one of which can make what’s effectively laws?

      because the European Union contains more than 600 million people and almost 30 very diverse countries (and is a supranational, not federal body). It's institutions also do mirror the structures of most other large unions.

      The Commission is an executive body, the parliament is a legislative body, and the council is comparable to the state bodies in bicameral governments. You may as well ask why you have a Senate or Bundesrat when you have a HoR and Bundestag. Because minoritarian and majoritarian interests need to be balanced, even more so in the EU. If even actual nation states a fraction the size of the EU and bona fide countries aren't governed in unitary fashion, why do you expect anybody would centralize so much power in the EU.

      2 replies →

  • > I think the main purpose of the EU is to prevent wars between European states by providing a forum for compromise and cooperation.

    It should have stayed this way.