← Back to context Comment by queenkjuul 2 days ago It's the notably poor quality of LLM-generated code 3 comments queenkjuul Reply Petersipoi 2 days ago As opposed to the incredible code that humans are known to write... hoppp 2 days ago If attention is all we need then what is betterHours of human attentionor a few seconds of AI attention?I am not just talking about writing the code but the brainstorming that goes into it. queenkjuul 19 hours ago I mean, yes? Every engineer on my team produces better code than Claude. There are plenty of examples of excellent human produced code, so this argument always falls flat for me.
Petersipoi 2 days ago As opposed to the incredible code that humans are known to write... hoppp 2 days ago If attention is all we need then what is betterHours of human attentionor a few seconds of AI attention?I am not just talking about writing the code but the brainstorming that goes into it. queenkjuul 19 hours ago I mean, yes? Every engineer on my team produces better code than Claude. There are plenty of examples of excellent human produced code, so this argument always falls flat for me.
hoppp 2 days ago If attention is all we need then what is betterHours of human attentionor a few seconds of AI attention?I am not just talking about writing the code but the brainstorming that goes into it.
queenkjuul 19 hours ago I mean, yes? Every engineer on my team produces better code than Claude. There are plenty of examples of excellent human produced code, so this argument always falls flat for me.
As opposed to the incredible code that humans are known to write...
If attention is all we need then what is better
Hours of human attention
or a few seconds of AI attention?
I am not just talking about writing the code but the brainstorming that goes into it.
I mean, yes? Every engineer on my team produces better code than Claude. There are plenty of examples of excellent human produced code, so this argument always falls flat for me.