← Back to context Comment by preisschild 2 days ago How is this good? Copyleft licenses are also being ignored. 6 comments preisschild Reply moi2388 1 day ago Patents and copyright stifles innovation. Knowledge should be communal and free. preisschild 1 day ago > Knowledge should be communal and freeI agree, which is why I license my work under copyleft licenses such as AGPLv3 so that anyone has to make their modifications public too.I think LLMs (especially closed-source models) will make this worse. self_awareness 1 day ago Free and communal knowledge means you're easily replaceble by someone else.I wonder what communal answer you have for someone who would say, "moi2388, your work will be now done by moi2389. Thanks and good bye." win311fwg 1 day ago The alternative is that you are not easily replaceable, which means that moi2389 is the one who doesn't get to do the work. Which is good for moi2388, perhaps, but what about moi2389? Either way someone is going to be left out in the cold. 2 replies →
moi2388 1 day ago Patents and copyright stifles innovation. Knowledge should be communal and free. preisschild 1 day ago > Knowledge should be communal and freeI agree, which is why I license my work under copyleft licenses such as AGPLv3 so that anyone has to make their modifications public too.I think LLMs (especially closed-source models) will make this worse. self_awareness 1 day ago Free and communal knowledge means you're easily replaceble by someone else.I wonder what communal answer you have for someone who would say, "moi2388, your work will be now done by moi2389. Thanks and good bye." win311fwg 1 day ago The alternative is that you are not easily replaceable, which means that moi2389 is the one who doesn't get to do the work. Which is good for moi2388, perhaps, but what about moi2389? Either way someone is going to be left out in the cold. 2 replies →
preisschild 1 day ago > Knowledge should be communal and freeI agree, which is why I license my work under copyleft licenses such as AGPLv3 so that anyone has to make their modifications public too.I think LLMs (especially closed-source models) will make this worse.
self_awareness 1 day ago Free and communal knowledge means you're easily replaceble by someone else.I wonder what communal answer you have for someone who would say, "moi2388, your work will be now done by moi2389. Thanks and good bye." win311fwg 1 day ago The alternative is that you are not easily replaceable, which means that moi2389 is the one who doesn't get to do the work. Which is good for moi2388, perhaps, but what about moi2389? Either way someone is going to be left out in the cold. 2 replies →
win311fwg 1 day ago The alternative is that you are not easily replaceable, which means that moi2389 is the one who doesn't get to do the work. Which is good for moi2388, perhaps, but what about moi2389? Either way someone is going to be left out in the cold. 2 replies →
Patents and copyright stifles innovation. Knowledge should be communal and free.
> Knowledge should be communal and free
I agree, which is why I license my work under copyleft licenses such as AGPLv3 so that anyone has to make their modifications public too.
I think LLMs (especially closed-source models) will make this worse.
Free and communal knowledge means you're easily replaceble by someone else.
I wonder what communal answer you have for someone who would say, "moi2388, your work will be now done by moi2389. Thanks and good bye."
The alternative is that you are not easily replaceable, which means that moi2389 is the one who doesn't get to do the work. Which is good for moi2388, perhaps, but what about moi2389? Either way someone is going to be left out in the cold.
2 replies →