← Back to context Comment by noname120 3 hours ago Source? 4 comments noname120 Reply zX41ZdbW 3 hours ago Just tested a few minutes ago on the ClickBench dataset. Overall quite good, but, depending on particular columns, most of the time slower - e.g., ~2.0 vs ~2.8 GB/sec on Graviton 4 machine in AWS. zX41ZdbW 2 hours ago https://pastila.nl/?cafebabe/5763fb6ec6db85bf0f20fbd710a8c83... croemer 3 hours ago You probably meant MB/sec not GB. wmf 2 hours ago No? Decompression is rated in GB/s per core now.
zX41ZdbW 3 hours ago Just tested a few minutes ago on the ClickBench dataset. Overall quite good, but, depending on particular columns, most of the time slower - e.g., ~2.0 vs ~2.8 GB/sec on Graviton 4 machine in AWS. zX41ZdbW 2 hours ago https://pastila.nl/?cafebabe/5763fb6ec6db85bf0f20fbd710a8c83... croemer 3 hours ago You probably meant MB/sec not GB. wmf 2 hours ago No? Decompression is rated in GB/s per core now.
croemer 3 hours ago You probably meant MB/sec not GB. wmf 2 hours ago No? Decompression is rated in GB/s per core now.
Just tested a few minutes ago on the ClickBench dataset. Overall quite good, but, depending on particular columns, most of the time slower - e.g., ~2.0 vs ~2.8 GB/sec on Graviton 4 machine in AWS.
https://pastila.nl/?cafebabe/5763fb6ec6db85bf0f20fbd710a8c83...
You probably meant MB/sec not GB.
No? Decompression is rated in GB/s per core now.