← Back to context

Comment by metalsiliconYT

4 hours ago

So you would prefer weapons that cannot reason at all?

> "You're absolutely right, that wasn't a military target—it was actually a girls school. It won't happen again!"

Most likely this event happened due to a bad targeting system that wasn't smart enough, if it had a better llm underpinning it (assuming it had any) maybe those lives would have been saved. More reason for more smart people like the author to work on these systems.

> So you would prefer weapons that cannot reason at all?

Um, yes? It's bad enough humans are murdering each other. At least a human can in theory be held accountable for pulling the trigger. The last thing we need is an unaccountable ralph loop reasoning about which schools and churches to bomb every time it wakes up.

> if it had a better llm underpinning it

Ah yes, the "LLMs are intelligent, you're just not using the newest fanciest model" fallacy. This time with innocent lives on the line. If only we used ChatGPT-8.9 instead of 8.8, those poor kids would still be alive today.

President Trump reveals the US Space Force has CAMERAS that can read the NAME TAG "Mohammad" trying to reach any nuclear dust in Iran

"We say: 'Mohammad something is there with shovels.'"

"We have cameras that can read the badge of the person. 'Mohammed Something.'"

"WE'RE WATCHING. If anybody goes there, THEY GET BLOWN UP."

"Eventually, we'll take it."

They have also admitted they saw the children’s flower chalk drawings too. And they double tapped.