← Back to context Comment by make_it_sure 2 months ago getting into politics again... 8 comments make_it_sure Reply greggoB 2 months ago I think examples such as letting people nudify children qualifies xAI as a bad actor without having to be political. blizzard_dev_17 2 months ago but the first thing a democrat does IS this greggoB 2 months ago I don't understand this sentence. munificent 2 months ago How is it possible for deciding whether or not to build on the labor of some other organized group of people to not be politics? grim_io 2 months ago You know who is apolitical? Russian voters. Works out great for them. fwip 2 months ago There's plenty of non-political reasons to avoid believing anything that a con-man says. nozzlegear 2 months ago You can't separate the man or his business from the politics, he wades into every political debate he can and deliberately tries to troll as many of his perceived enemies as possible. mplewis 2 months ago Grok is a generator of child sexual assault material.
greggoB 2 months ago I think examples such as letting people nudify children qualifies xAI as a bad actor without having to be political. blizzard_dev_17 2 months ago but the first thing a democrat does IS this greggoB 2 months ago I don't understand this sentence.
blizzard_dev_17 2 months ago but the first thing a democrat does IS this greggoB 2 months ago I don't understand this sentence.
munificent 2 months ago How is it possible for deciding whether or not to build on the labor of some other organized group of people to not be politics?
fwip 2 months ago There's plenty of non-political reasons to avoid believing anything that a con-man says.
nozzlegear 2 months ago You can't separate the man or his business from the politics, he wades into every political debate he can and deliberately tries to troll as many of his perceived enemies as possible.
I think examples such as letting people nudify children qualifies xAI as a bad actor without having to be political.
but the first thing a democrat does IS this
I don't understand this sentence.
How is it possible for deciding whether or not to build on the labor of some other organized group of people to not be politics?
You know who is apolitical? Russian voters. Works out great for them.
There's plenty of non-political reasons to avoid believing anything that a con-man says.
You can't separate the man or his business from the politics, he wades into every political debate he can and deliberately tries to troll as many of his perceived enemies as possible.
Grok is a generator of child sexual assault material.