← Back to context

Comment by dijit

5 hours ago

I find the premise of your comment completely incredulous.

I totally understand tribalism, and Elon and X aren't exactly well favoured. (not even by me)

But what you're saying right now is that they advertised the fact that they can create child pornography and deepfakes..

I simply don't believe it, unless you provide evidence.

Elon himself promoted Grok’s “spicy mode” that allowed generating NSFW content that the other AI vendors wouldn’t touch with a 20 foot pole.

Believe whatever you want. Elon’s beliefs and personality problems have been baked into the core of Grok, so it’s no surprise that it turned out to be a CSAM-generating MechaHitler that steals people’s data.

Anybody surprised when Grok turns out to be trash really should read up on the guy who made it.

  • Tumblr also permitted some more risqué content.

    Yet we (rightly) condemned those that used this leniency to do nefarious things.

    I'm really ready to get on the Elon hate train, and I will grant you that there was a problem that needs fixing, but I'm really not happy with the amount of censorship on these generative AI platforms.

    Groks harness also clearly biases towards Elons views, Yet the washington post claims it's the most even handed and least likely to give politically biased answers: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/interactive/2026/0...

    idk how to interpret all this, despite being genuinely anti-Elon, I don't think I'm personally willing to immolate a company forever because the guardrails were temporarily too loose.

    I'm not trying to make an equivalency for facts vs deepfake porn, but there is one there unfortunately, and overall internet freedom has been curtailed a lot by advertising friendliness.

    • I also don’t think one mistake should define a company. But for me it’s just about trust.

      Musk has proven time after time that he doesn’t deserve my trust. I will never trust Grok as long as he’s in charge of it.

      I agree that the guardrails on the top models have gotten out of hand, though.

      Fable for instance won’t answer even basic health questions. As if you are going to take nutrition advice and make a bioweapon with it.

      Partly this is due to government interference. Hopefully we get to a better place as competition heats up with open and Chinese models.