← Back to context

Comment by exodust

2 months ago

Sounds like you've tried generating such things. You've seen things people wouldn't believe. Inappropriate AI images off the shoulder of Orion, etc.

Now the counter-weight over-compensation. Insisting the tool "doesn't have enough safeguards". Could it be that our AI usage innocence is related to how much we criticise the tool for not policing us enough?

Meanwhile the rest of us have never seen such images because we're not looking for those images, or trying to prompt for those images, or thinking about those images. How about the people using these tools take responsibility, rather than forcing colossal layers of safeguards on everything and everyone?

5 comments

exodust

Reply
jdiff  2 months ago

This is in headlines, dude. This smear attempt is intellectually dishonest and eyeroll inducing.

  • exodust  2 months ago

    You said: "I've seen it generate such things"

    By your own admission, you've seen it generate such things.

    Meanwhile, I've never seen it generate such things because I don't write sicko prompts, and the guardrails in place prevent such images. Most people have never seen it generate such things, but apparently you have. I couldn't be more intellectually honest if I tried.

Lomlioto  2 months ago

It started by school kids generating images of their peers.

Researchers and police investigated this -> experts.

People found out (like the researches and investigators) that its very easy to generate this type of content.

Elon Musk himself though absolutly knows about this and how easy is to generate porn. Its his thing, freedom before anything else. Why would anyone tell the richest person on the planet what he can or can't do.

Its disappointing to see that you don't think that the richest person on the planet doesn't need to do more to protect miss use but reframe it like this.