This implies a long road to catch up. But seems to be that all one needs to do to be on the cutting edge is to integrate a few scripts that support a cutting edge model. Which you then converse with in natural language. So how higher will the bar to entry be five years from now?
How? I mean what could be the ultimate usefulness of Claude if not to make money, just like NFT but with extra steps. Most people isn't using Claude to make massive paradigm shift breakthrough discoveries. Nobody's curing cancer nor solving climate change. Probably the most common use case for llms it's just speed up the grind and make money. Like nfts.
This implies a long road to catch up. But seems to be that all one needs to do to be on the cutting edge is to integrate a few scripts that support a cutting edge model. Which you then converse with in natural language. So how higher will the bar to entry be five years from now?
For what it's worth, which may be nothing, I remember being told that by NFT people.
NFTs are not useful, claude is.
>claude is
How? I mean what could be the ultimate usefulness of Claude if not to make money, just like NFT but with extra steps. Most people isn't using Claude to make massive paradigm shift breakthrough discoveries. Nobody's curing cancer nor solving climate change. Probably the most common use case for llms it's just speed up the grind and make money. Like nfts.
1 reply →
How am I being left behind by not using AI? I have a fully functional brain that I can use to do anything AI can and better.
You can't do it faster, certainly. But if you used it to do all the things you're slow at, you get all of the above.
Eventually everyone will be without a job other than the Bros working at AI companies.
Or the bubble will implode and we see ourselves at the job queue anyway.