← Back to context Comment by LocalH 2 days ago Microsoft BASIC was a pretty decent interpreter, I wouldn't call it "shitware", so there you go? 5 comments LocalH Reply olyjohn 1 day ago I don't remember DOS 6.22 blue screening on me. Maybe it wasn't so bad. pwdisswordfishq 1 day ago That's because it black-screened instead. LocalH 10 hours ago Ah for the days when the OS didn't stop you from jerking off every hardware bit lstodd 1 day ago I would have preferred a Forth on my C64 seriously. But no, we were stuck with this "38911 bytes free" crap. LocalH 10 hours ago If you checked any of the contemporaries, C64 offered more free BASIC RAM than others.
olyjohn 1 day ago I don't remember DOS 6.22 blue screening on me. Maybe it wasn't so bad. pwdisswordfishq 1 day ago That's because it black-screened instead. LocalH 10 hours ago Ah for the days when the OS didn't stop you from jerking off every hardware bit
pwdisswordfishq 1 day ago That's because it black-screened instead. LocalH 10 hours ago Ah for the days when the OS didn't stop you from jerking off every hardware bit
lstodd 1 day ago I would have preferred a Forth on my C64 seriously. But no, we were stuck with this "38911 bytes free" crap. LocalH 10 hours ago If you checked any of the contemporaries, C64 offered more free BASIC RAM than others.
LocalH 10 hours ago If you checked any of the contemporaries, C64 offered more free BASIC RAM than others.
I don't remember DOS 6.22 blue screening on me. Maybe it wasn't so bad.
That's because it black-screened instead.
Ah for the days when the OS didn't stop you from jerking off every hardware bit
I would have preferred a Forth on my C64 seriously. But no, we were stuck with this "38911 bytes free" crap.
If you checked any of the contemporaries, C64 offered more free BASIC RAM than others.