← Back to context Comment by LocalH 2 months ago Microsoft BASIC was a pretty decent interpreter, I wouldn't call it "shitware", so there you go? 5 comments LocalH Reply lstodd 2 months ago I would have preferred a Forth on my C64 seriously. But no, we were stuck with this "38911 bytes free" crap. LocalH 2 months ago If you checked any of the contemporaries, C64 offered more free BASIC RAM than others. olyjohn 2 months ago I don't remember DOS 6.22 blue screening on me. Maybe it wasn't so bad. pwdisswordfishq 2 months ago That's because it black-screened instead. LocalH 2 months ago Ah for the days when the OS didn't stop you from jerking off every hardware bit
lstodd 2 months ago I would have preferred a Forth on my C64 seriously. But no, we were stuck with this "38911 bytes free" crap. LocalH 2 months ago If you checked any of the contemporaries, C64 offered more free BASIC RAM than others.
LocalH 2 months ago If you checked any of the contemporaries, C64 offered more free BASIC RAM than others.
olyjohn 2 months ago I don't remember DOS 6.22 blue screening on me. Maybe it wasn't so bad. pwdisswordfishq 2 months ago That's because it black-screened instead. LocalH 2 months ago Ah for the days when the OS didn't stop you from jerking off every hardware bit
pwdisswordfishq 2 months ago That's because it black-screened instead. LocalH 2 months ago Ah for the days when the OS didn't stop you from jerking off every hardware bit
I would have preferred a Forth on my C64 seriously. But no, we were stuck with this "38911 bytes free" crap.
If you checked any of the contemporaries, C64 offered more free BASIC RAM than others.
I don't remember DOS 6.22 blue screening on me. Maybe it wasn't so bad.
That's because it black-screened instead.
Ah for the days when the OS didn't stop you from jerking off every hardware bit