Comment by fn-mote
2 months ago
The citation needed is for the other part, which claims a mathematician got an amateur proof which was correct.
Nobody is reading unsolicited proofs. They are like spam.
Source: personal friend of a “crank”.
2 months ago
The citation needed is for the other part, which claims a mathematician got an amateur proof which was correct.
Nobody is reading unsolicited proofs. They are like spam.
Source: personal friend of a “crank”.
No comments yet
Contribute on Hacker News ↗