← Back to context

Comment by inigyou

1 day ago

I suppose the idea could be that you have several different institutions holding the same data, which they know is valid because of the Blockchain.

No. Blockchain is made for managing transactions between untrusted parties. In case with a land, there is an authority managing the registry, so a standard relational DB (with optional digital signatures) is the bets option. Why someone wants to use a tool, not good for a specific purpose, for that exact purpose?