← Back to context Comment by 1234letshaveatw 7 days ago are you advocating for not changing administrations? 6 comments 1234letshaveatw Reply nixon_why69 7 days ago Is that a good faith question? Please check the site guidelines. 1234letshaveatw 7 days ago It is, and certainly relevant (although perhaps inconvenient) considering the recent elections in China. Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections? pessimizer 7 days ago This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?" bigyabai 7 days ago > Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo... linkregister 7 days ago uses rhetoriccounterparty uses rhetoric in response"Hey! No fair!" nixon_why69 7 days ago Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.
nixon_why69 7 days ago Is that a good faith question? Please check the site guidelines. 1234letshaveatw 7 days ago It is, and certainly relevant (although perhaps inconvenient) considering the recent elections in China. Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections? pessimizer 7 days ago This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?" bigyabai 7 days ago > Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo... linkregister 7 days ago uses rhetoriccounterparty uses rhetoric in response"Hey! No fair!" nixon_why69 7 days ago Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.
1234letshaveatw 7 days ago It is, and certainly relevant (although perhaps inconvenient) considering the recent elections in China. Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections? pessimizer 7 days ago This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?" bigyabai 7 days ago > Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo...
pessimizer 7 days ago This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?"
bigyabai 7 days ago > Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo...
linkregister 7 days ago uses rhetoriccounterparty uses rhetoric in response"Hey! No fair!" nixon_why69 7 days ago Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.
nixon_why69 7 days ago Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.
Is that a good faith question? Please check the site guidelines.
It is, and certainly relevant (although perhaps inconvenient) considering the recent elections in China. Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?
This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?"
> Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?
It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo...
uses rhetoric
counterparty uses rhetoric in response
"Hey! No fair!"
Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.
There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.