← Back to context Comment by nixon_why69 7 days ago Is that a good faith question? Please check the site guidelines. 5 comments nixon_why69 Reply 1234letshaveatw 7 days ago It is, and certainly relevant (although perhaps inconvenient) considering the recent elections in China. Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections? pessimizer 7 days ago This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?" bigyabai 7 days ago > Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo... linkregister 7 days ago uses rhetoriccounterparty uses rhetoric in response"Hey! No fair!" nixon_why69 7 days ago Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.
1234letshaveatw 7 days ago It is, and certainly relevant (although perhaps inconvenient) considering the recent elections in China. Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections? pessimizer 7 days ago This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?" bigyabai 7 days ago > Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo...
pessimizer 7 days ago This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?"
bigyabai 7 days ago > Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo...
linkregister 7 days ago uses rhetoriccounterparty uses rhetoric in response"Hey! No fair!" nixon_why69 7 days ago Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.
nixon_why69 7 days ago Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.
It is, and certainly relevant (although perhaps inconvenient) considering the recent elections in China. Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?
This is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?"
> Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?
It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo...
uses rhetoric
counterparty uses rhetoric in response
"Hey! No fair!"
Pointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric.
There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.