Comment by throwaway201606
4 hours ago
I appreciate this clarrification comment: had originally read this as option B and was wondering "why would they say this?"
4 hours ago
I appreciate this clarrification comment: had originally read this as option B and was wondering "why would they say this?"
I always read it as option b as well. I figured it meant they wanted to avoid the "too many cooks" problems that plagues all popular languages, and especially avoid extreme pressure from powerful "clients" to make specific changes. IE, was about control.
But ya, now that I see nine_k's comment, option makes a lot of sense.
I always took it as "make the 'best' decision [1] without regard for whether or not it's going to be popular or make the language more business-friendly".
[1] however you choose to define "best"
Me too, but I think it means to avoid being constrained by success, like Python 2.
Elm took this a little to far.