← Back to context Comment by armarr 11 hours ago GLM was twice as verbose running the Artificial Analysis benchmark. So it ends up being more expensive 3 comments armarr Reply Havoc 10 hours ago >verboseGLM defaults to max effort btwhttps://docs.together.ai/docs/glm-5.2-quickstart#reasoning-e... maxloh 10 hours ago Not really. Gemini 3.6 Flash actually cost $0.01 more per task, compared to GLM 5.2.https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash mdasen 1 hour ago But to run the entire benchmark it cost $727 with Gemini 3.6 Flash and $925 with GLM-5.2, $198 (21.4%) less. I tend to look at the cost to run the whole index rather than the weighted average cost per task.
Havoc 10 hours ago >verboseGLM defaults to max effort btwhttps://docs.together.ai/docs/glm-5.2-quickstart#reasoning-e...
maxloh 10 hours ago Not really. Gemini 3.6 Flash actually cost $0.01 more per task, compared to GLM 5.2.https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash mdasen 1 hour ago But to run the entire benchmark it cost $727 with Gemini 3.6 Flash and $925 with GLM-5.2, $198 (21.4%) less. I tend to look at the cost to run the whole index rather than the weighted average cost per task.
mdasen 1 hour ago But to run the entire benchmark it cost $727 with Gemini 3.6 Flash and $925 with GLM-5.2, $198 (21.4%) less. I tend to look at the cost to run the whole index rather than the weighted average cost per task.
>verbose
GLM defaults to max effort btw
https://docs.together.ai/docs/glm-5.2-quickstart#reasoning-e...
Not really. Gemini 3.6 Flash actually cost $0.01 more per task, compared to GLM 5.2.
https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
But to run the entire benchmark it cost $727 with Gemini 3.6 Flash and $925 with GLM-5.2, $198 (21.4%) less. I tend to look at the cost to run the whole index rather than the weighted average cost per task.