← Back to context Comment by aroman 7 days ago No, it wouldn’t. The hours in question are human experience, not that of the agent. 2 comments aroman Reply jayd16 6 days ago Why not? You have far more results to review.If you run a model on slower hardware are you getting more experience? Surely its a factor of model output reviewed and not human time. aroman 6 days ago Right, it's about how much time the human spent - the time spent by the machine itself is irrelevant. As you rightly point out: that is why we measure programmer experience by wall clock time, not CPU time :)
jayd16 6 days ago Why not? You have far more results to review.If you run a model on slower hardware are you getting more experience? Surely its a factor of model output reviewed and not human time. aroman 6 days ago Right, it's about how much time the human spent - the time spent by the machine itself is irrelevant. As you rightly point out: that is why we measure programmer experience by wall clock time, not CPU time :)
aroman 6 days ago Right, it's about how much time the human spent - the time spent by the machine itself is irrelevant. As you rightly point out: that is why we measure programmer experience by wall clock time, not CPU time :)
Why not? You have far more results to review.
If you run a model on slower hardware are you getting more experience? Surely its a factor of model output reviewed and not human time.
Right, it's about how much time the human spent - the time spent by the machine itself is irrelevant. As you rightly point out: that is why we measure programmer experience by wall clock time, not CPU time :)