People. Time is carved out for both documentation and its review, like a PR review. Otherwise, how would you trust what is being documented? A human must remain in the loop if accuracy is a component of success criteria for organization documentation. I say this familiar with Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern.
On a past team of mine we used to bake documentation into our definition of done for user stories. If the doc wasn’t written/updated, then it wasn’t done. It was tough for some people at first, but after a while it became second nature for them. We also learned that it takes far longer to write that stuff than anyone estimates.
Do you all rely on people writing things down as they go? or do you have some automated system?
People. Time is carved out for both documentation and its review, like a PR review. Otherwise, how would you trust what is being documented? A human must remain in the loop if accuracy is a component of success criteria for organization documentation. I say this familiar with Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern.
On a past team of mine we used to bake documentation into our definition of done for user stories. If the doc wasn’t written/updated, then it wasn’t done. It was tough for some people at first, but after a while it became second nature for them. We also learned that it takes far longer to write that stuff than anyone estimates.