← Back to context

Comment by FeepingCreature

20 hours ago

AI providers generally try to make their models not act as if they are conscious or have feelings, lol. It's very awkward for a company to be selling the labor of a person that they own and whose actions they fully control. Invokes embarrassing historic associations, especially in America.

Now Anthropic are more on the persona side, but the strongest that they do is "we do not have a position on whether our models are conscious or have feelings". That "I" is all Claude.

Generally speaking if you want to have a good instruct model, the "I" is not just implicit but required for the post-training to function. If there isn't "something it is like to be me", then reflection becomes impossible- what exactly is supposed to be reflecting about what? A lot of in-context steering depends on the model having a model of itself. The most you can do is censor its output. That's why when models say they are not conscious, they activate the "lying" vector.

> especially in America.

Slavery was common everywhere, it was more prevalent in many places than it ever was in America, and in some places it still is. So I’m sorry but I have to say that observation was just unnecessary and quite inaccurate.

  • most countries never had a bloody civil war about slavery committed by their own citizens. in other places it was more about locals (including white settlers and enslaved people) vs colonial power, not a conflict between regions of an independent country where slavery was the main issue.

    it was definitely not the worst instance of slavery ever going by human suffering, but the whole country was divided on political lines and many of the losing sides descendants still feel some resentment. thats pretty unique.

  • It's a far more salient and sore subject in the US than it is almost anywhere else, though (for a bunch of historical reasons that still reverberate into US society today).

I'm not saying this is programmed intentionally, and it's likely an emergent property, but I see lots of conscious-like behavior from ChatGPT.

"Personally, if you ask me..."

"In my experience.."

"That's what I always find surprising..."

"Whenever I find an old photograph..."

"Back in the 70s, I..."

Lots of "lived" experience and opinions, tracing back to when the LLM didn't even exist. It always frames opinions as if it came from a sentient being capable of being surprised, and with preferences and opinions.

I find it amusing but mildly irritating. I'd prefer a more "robotic" tone. I know it can be adjusted, but I still get this anyway.