Comment by ghaff
5 hours ago
He was a very readable columnist for PC Mag among other places. He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct.
>He was a hilarious curmudgeon.
Agreed.
5 hours ago
He was a very readable columnist for PC Mag among other places. He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct.
>He was a hilarious curmudgeon.
Agreed.
>> He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct.
So exactly like everyone today, but also interesting?
He set the style of being confidently incorrect. At least he was entertaining.
He would make a great AI!
Probably. With some exceptions, he wasn't flat out wrong. But he did push the boundaries from time to time.