← Back to context Comment by happytoexplain 1 hour ago Lack of a negative is the least compelling anecdote possible. 2 comments happytoexplain Reply assimpleaspossi 32 minutes ago How about 16 years of lacking a negative? Does that count?How about never heard of any issues till this unverified, anonymous thread. Shouldn't that make one suspicious of it? Does that count? happytoexplain 20 minutes ago I don't understand where the anger is coming from. No, of course it's not as valid as positives (i.e. "I experienced X" vs "I never experienced X").
assimpleaspossi 32 minutes ago How about 16 years of lacking a negative? Does that count?How about never heard of any issues till this unverified, anonymous thread. Shouldn't that make one suspicious of it? Does that count? happytoexplain 20 minutes ago I don't understand where the anger is coming from. No, of course it's not as valid as positives (i.e. "I experienced X" vs "I never experienced X").
happytoexplain 20 minutes ago I don't understand where the anger is coming from. No, of course it's not as valid as positives (i.e. "I experienced X" vs "I never experienced X").
How about 16 years of lacking a negative? Does that count?
How about never heard of any issues till this unverified, anonymous thread. Shouldn't that make one suspicious of it? Does that count?
I don't understand where the anger is coming from. No, of course it's not as valid as positives (i.e. "I experienced X" vs "I never experienced X").