Comment by Pay08
4 days ago
Not to mention what happens when these rules cease to be rules on purely technical matters. What if they make a rule against the site allowing hosting the code *of* AI agents for example?
4 days ago
Not to mention what happens when these rules cease to be rules on purely technical matters. What if they make a rule against the site allowing hosting the code *of* AI agents for example?
Codeberg did make such a rule. Their announcement explicitly says that "Projects heavily tied to the LLM ecosytem" are "no longer [...] welcome on Codeberg". The code for an AI agent would definitely fall into that category.
That's not true. The new "rule" say:
> 7. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5).
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/commit/71149c7fc95ccfeae36...
Yes, that is unrelated to the rule he is refering to.
Then you have your agent create you your own codeberg, with blackjack, and hookers.
Can the LLM also materialise a server and free electricity for me?
So you want free hosting and free services and you also want to dictate how you are able to use them?
No, but it can pretend to do that, which is close enough.
You're paying for the LLM already, which is running on a server and consumes electricity.
Are you of the opinion that you are entitled to a free server and electricity?
Why would you need a server? a pi would do.
1 reply →