← Back to context

Comment by bayindirh

9 hours ago

When Google first announced sideloading restrictions, somebody told “but we have ADB”, and who disagreed with them was criticized harshly.

Now, I’m waiting for a workaround to enable ADB, so sideloading can be handled now, too.

Android is not more open that iOS for a very long time now. The trend will continue.

Again, this is not a technical problem (the mindset of Google), so technological solutions won’t help.

> Again, this is not a technical problem (the mindset of Google)

This is not even Google's mindset, the control strings of this mindset stretch far beyond its management and board of directors.

That's the OBEY from the timeless Carpenter's classic.

[flagged]

  • > which is the intended use

    "Intended use" (as understood by Google) for my smartphone is apparently providing them with data, consuming their advertisements and overpaying for apps that display ads and where you need in-app purchases to unlock basic functionality.

    > not as a hack for escalating privileges

    Hack for "escalating privileges" on my own device so I can do nefarious actions like uninstalling bloatware, denying apps internet access, recording calls (legally).. how could that be?

    • >like uninstalling bloatware, denying apps internet access

      All of these can be done with a computer.

      >recording calls (legally)..

      A second phone does the same thing.

      >Hack for "escalating privileges" on my own device so I can do nefarious actions

      Whether it's a "hack" is orthogonal to whether you control the device or not. I don't think anyone disputes that you "own" your linux PC, but using the well known `docker run --privileged ...`[1] method to get root on your machine is still a hack.

      [1] random result: https://github.com/Volodishlav/Docker-Privilege-Escalation

      2 replies →