Comment by azan_
3 days ago
> If love to see supporting long term evidence for this (ie, not just localized "see, stonks went up in the 90s").
For what exactly, for growth? https://ourworldindata.org/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/qLq-8BTgXU8... here
3 days ago
> If love to see supporting long term evidence for this (ie, not just localized "see, stonks went up in the 90s").
For what exactly, for growth? https://ourworldindata.org/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/qLq-8BTgXU8... here
That increasing inequality is generally preferable for everybody.
But that's not what I said.
That is literally what you said
> large growth but largest in top decile vs no growth, the first one is absolutely 1000x times better