Comment by slashdave
3 days ago
> So someone could simply do a passthrough, and give the uncopyrightable output to someone else to distill
It seems you do not understand what distillation is.
3 days ago
> So someone could simply do a passthrough, and give the uncopyrightable output to someone else to distill
It seems you do not understand what distillation is.
You have misunderstood my statement.
I am saying that someone else would use that output to create or improve a different model. I think you could have figured out that this was the meaning of my statement instead of doing the irrelevant nitpick that you did.
Its also unrelated to my point, which is that person 1 could give the data from model A to person 2, and person 2 would be fine because they didn't sign any TOS contracts with model A, and the output from model AI is not copyrightable and therefore can be redistributed.
Additionally, it still doesn't address the point about how the original model trained on a bunch of other people's stuff without permission, so I don't see why the same shouldn't be done to their outputted content.
Do you have any substantive disagreements or are you just going to make a minute, incorrect nitpick and then not elaborate?