← Back to context Comment by fastball 2 days ago The fact you called it ChatGPT instead of Codex makes me suspicious of this entire comment. 2 comments fastball Reply nullbio 2 days ago Weird take. I meant to say GPT, not ChatGPT. Was referring to the model, not the harness. fastball 2 days ago Is it? There are shills and bots all over the internet, and referring to the model as ChatGPT is probably common for some people, but not for software engineers that actually track and compare the models (at least in my experience).
nullbio 2 days ago Weird take. I meant to say GPT, not ChatGPT. Was referring to the model, not the harness. fastball 2 days ago Is it? There are shills and bots all over the internet, and referring to the model as ChatGPT is probably common for some people, but not for software engineers that actually track and compare the models (at least in my experience).
fastball 2 days ago Is it? There are shills and bots all over the internet, and referring to the model as ChatGPT is probably common for some people, but not for software engineers that actually track and compare the models (at least in my experience).
Weird take. I meant to say GPT, not ChatGPT. Was referring to the model, not the harness.
Is it? There are shills and bots all over the internet, and referring to the model as ChatGPT is probably common for some people, but not for software engineers that actually track and compare the models (at least in my experience).