Comment by wiml
2 days ago
My interpretation of TwiztidK's comment is that they could save the cost of that .5–2 MW power draw by switching to a battery chemistry with looser temperature requirements.
2 days ago
My interpretation of TwiztidK's comment is that they could save the cost of that .5–2 MW power draw by switching to a battery chemistry with looser temperature requirements.
Thank you, I was confused as well. This makes sense. Similar fixed cost and much lower/negligible variable cost.