← Back to context

Comment by mikeweiss

18 hours ago

I think it's insulting

What's the less insulting but similarly concise way to make the same substantive point?

It is, and autism is just the swap-in vulnerable minority of the day that is socially acceptable to be the butt of the joke.

If you don't understand what I mean, swap out "autistic" for "retarded" and the joke still functions, but a lot more people will be offended by it.

I still laughed though.

  • I don't think that makes sense.

    I'm not disagreeing with your overall point, but autistic in that comment is attempting to capture that "literal rhetoric but socially unaware" style of argument people can have when they argue a point too black and white.

    "Retarded" does not imply this

    I would say the problem with the comment is more in line with how OCD or adhd is used, improperly. Like despite autism being a spectrum with traits that can't be reduced to that one stereotype.

    It's being used to invoke a stereotype of neurodivergence. Not as a stand in for general stupidity.

  • Yeah, shit's re.... dumb I mean. It's interesting we're still allowed to use dumb this way.

    • Most of our insults against intelligence come from medical terminology originally. Every word eventually starts being used offensively, and then a new one gets coined and the cycle continues.

      2 replies →

It's kind of funny and also kind of insulting. I'd laugh if a friend said it but said seriously by some rando on the Internet, nah, find a better way to put it.