← Back to context Comment by p-e-w 19 hours ago The fact that 99.99% of humans have never used a formal theorem prover? 4 comments p-e-w Reply vatsachak 18 hours ago Worse than 0.01% of humans means that there are 8,000,000 people better than it. I know that's being pedantic I understand what you're saying.But every time I use Codex unless I specifically give it the abstractions it writes code that is way too specific. DavidSJ 18 hours ago > Worse than 0.01% of humans means that there are 8,000,000 people better than it. I know that's being pedantic I understand what you're saying.Since we're being pedantic, it means that there are (approximately) 800,000 people better than it. ;) vatsachak 7 hours ago You're right, forgot a factor of 10 whoops slopinthebag 19 hours ago How do we know if they’re better or not if they haven’t used one?
vatsachak 18 hours ago Worse than 0.01% of humans means that there are 8,000,000 people better than it. I know that's being pedantic I understand what you're saying.But every time I use Codex unless I specifically give it the abstractions it writes code that is way too specific. DavidSJ 18 hours ago > Worse than 0.01% of humans means that there are 8,000,000 people better than it. I know that's being pedantic I understand what you're saying.Since we're being pedantic, it means that there are (approximately) 800,000 people better than it. ;) vatsachak 7 hours ago You're right, forgot a factor of 10 whoops
DavidSJ 18 hours ago > Worse than 0.01% of humans means that there are 8,000,000 people better than it. I know that's being pedantic I understand what you're saying.Since we're being pedantic, it means that there are (approximately) 800,000 people better than it. ;) vatsachak 7 hours ago You're right, forgot a factor of 10 whoops
Worse than 0.01% of humans means that there are 8,000,000 people better than it. I know that's being pedantic I understand what you're saying.
But every time I use Codex unless I specifically give it the abstractions it writes code that is way too specific.
> Worse than 0.01% of humans means that there are 8,000,000 people better than it. I know that's being pedantic I understand what you're saying.
Since we're being pedantic, it means that there are (approximately) 800,000 people better than it. ;)
You're right, forgot a factor of 10 whoops
How do we know if they’re better or not if they haven’t used one?