← Back to context Comment by reenorap 14 hours ago There’s no way to prove intent if you keep your mouth shut and don’t answer anything. 3 comments reenorap Reply victorbjorklund 12 hours ago Yea, that’s not how it works in practice. If they catch you standing over a dead body holding the murder weapon. Then you can’t just say they can’t prove intent if you keep your mouth shut. weli 9 hours ago Yea but that's where "reasonable suspicion" comes in a court of law. If you are standing next to a dead body, with a bloody knife in your hand. nkrisc 9 hours ago That’s good advice to not talk, but it won’t necessarily save you.
victorbjorklund 12 hours ago Yea, that’s not how it works in practice. If they catch you standing over a dead body holding the murder weapon. Then you can’t just say they can’t prove intent if you keep your mouth shut. weli 9 hours ago Yea but that's where "reasonable suspicion" comes in a court of law. If you are standing next to a dead body, with a bloody knife in your hand.
weli 9 hours ago Yea but that's where "reasonable suspicion" comes in a court of law. If you are standing next to a dead body, with a bloody knife in your hand.
Yea, that’s not how it works in practice. If they catch you standing over a dead body holding the murder weapon. Then you can’t just say they can’t prove intent if you keep your mouth shut.
Yea but that's where "reasonable suspicion" comes in a court of law. If you are standing next to a dead body, with a bloody knife in your hand.
That’s good advice to not talk, but it won’t necessarily save you.