← Back to context Comment by reenorap 15 hours ago There’s no way to prove intent if you keep your mouth shut and don’t answer anything. 3 comments reenorap Reply victorbjorklund 13 hours ago Yea, that’s not how it works in practice. If they catch you standing over a dead body holding the murder weapon. Then you can’t just say they can’t prove intent if you keep your mouth shut. weli 10 hours ago Yea but that's where "reasonable suspicion" comes in a court of law. If you are standing next to a dead body, with a bloody knife in your hand. nkrisc 10 hours ago That’s good advice to not talk, but it won’t necessarily save you.
victorbjorklund 13 hours ago Yea, that’s not how it works in practice. If they catch you standing over a dead body holding the murder weapon. Then you can’t just say they can’t prove intent if you keep your mouth shut. weli 10 hours ago Yea but that's where "reasonable suspicion" comes in a court of law. If you are standing next to a dead body, with a bloody knife in your hand.
weli 10 hours ago Yea but that's where "reasonable suspicion" comes in a court of law. If you are standing next to a dead body, with a bloody knife in your hand.
Yea, that’s not how it works in practice. If they catch you standing over a dead body holding the murder weapon. Then you can’t just say they can’t prove intent if you keep your mouth shut.
Yea but that's where "reasonable suspicion" comes in a court of law. If you are standing next to a dead body, with a bloody knife in your hand.
That’s good advice to not talk, but it won’t necessarily save you.