← Back to context Comment by feverzsj 1 day ago They scan too many classical literature. 5 comments feverzsj Reply recursivecaveat 1 day ago It probably tests well when they're doing reinforcement learning. Humans trying to use in-group terminology or uncommon vocabulary to impress other humans with their knowledge and sophistication is a tale as old as time. jappgar 1 day ago Or have too few programmers read classical literature? watwut 1 day ago Unlikely. A lot of classical literature is fairly readable. The only issue are archaic words of you use old translation. LearnYouALisp 1 day ago Too much classical literatureMany would be works, writings, etc. TacticalCoder 1 day ago Do they scan too many classical literature or does classical literature happen to love metaphors and allegories, which are basically weights/patterns?
recursivecaveat 1 day ago It probably tests well when they're doing reinforcement learning. Humans trying to use in-group terminology or uncommon vocabulary to impress other humans with their knowledge and sophistication is a tale as old as time.
watwut 1 day ago Unlikely. A lot of classical literature is fairly readable. The only issue are archaic words of you use old translation.
TacticalCoder 1 day ago Do they scan too many classical literature or does classical literature happen to love metaphors and allegories, which are basically weights/patterns?
It probably tests well when they're doing reinforcement learning. Humans trying to use in-group terminology or uncommon vocabulary to impress other humans with their knowledge and sophistication is a tale as old as time.
Or have too few programmers read classical literature?
Unlikely. A lot of classical literature is fairly readable. The only issue are archaic words of you use old translation.
Too much classical literature
Many would be works, writings, etc.
Do they scan too many classical literature or does classical literature happen to love metaphors and allegories, which are basically weights/patterns?