← Back to context Comment by Freedom2 10 hours ago [flagged] 5 comments Freedom2 Reply atmavatar 10 hours ago No interpretation was made. That's literally a direct quote from the article, which is itself a direct quote from a DOT spokesperson. datadrivenangel 10 hours ago The actual quotes in the article are more out there than the actual Onion (their print newspaper is great though) danorama 10 hours ago Please, do explain which parts of the original quoted statement are made in good faith. akerl_ 10 hours ago What is the good faith interpretation you’d suggest? wtfwhateven 10 hours ago What?
atmavatar 10 hours ago No interpretation was made. That's literally a direct quote from the article, which is itself a direct quote from a DOT spokesperson.
datadrivenangel 10 hours ago The actual quotes in the article are more out there than the actual Onion (their print newspaper is great though)
danorama 10 hours ago Please, do explain which parts of the original quoted statement are made in good faith.
No interpretation was made. That's literally a direct quote from the article, which is itself a direct quote from a DOT spokesperson.
The actual quotes in the article are more out there than the actual Onion (their print newspaper is great though)
Please, do explain which parts of the original quoted statement are made in good faith.
What is the good faith interpretation you’d suggest?
What?