← Back to context

Comment by vitalyan8184

1 month ago

>To everyone here pushing for total proliferation of ...

...general-purpose computers

...unbreakable encryption

...unbackdoored communication

...unkillswitched vehicles

...unsurveiled dwellings

>what should be done about ...?

nothing

>Do you seriously want this level of capabilities to be generally available with no guardrails?

yes

What about uranium enrichment?

  • [dead]

    • I think it would be entirely reasonable to ban death stars in private hands, the same way I think it's entirely reasonable to ban uranium enrichment in private hands. My point is that it's a question of fact about how risky an AI model can be. I think it's clear that current models are not enriched uranium or death star level, but I don't think there's anything ruling it out in the near future!