My position is that anyone can own a cannon and shells, but you only get to fire it once before the feds step in.
Giving a naval cannon to the average person does not threaten humanity any more than giving them a gun or an LLM does. None of them are a panacea for anything.
My position is that anyone can own a cannon and shells, but you only get to fire it once before the feds step in.
Giving a naval cannon to the average person does not threaten humanity any more than giving them a gun or an LLM does. None of them are a panacea for anything.
A mass shooter wakes up in the morning and thinks: "I'll fire my naval gun once, then politely hand it to the feds..."
I imagine that he'd be pulled over by the cops towing his artillery into battle, first.
2 replies →
It seems completely unhinged for civilians to have naval guns. You could level an entire neighborhood with one of those.
It's also completely unhinged to own a Shahed 136 or a ballistic missile, but both are fairly attainable and even legal within certain usages.
2 replies →