Until models become sentient, it requires a human to execute dangerous activities. Nations already have laws regarding what a human can and cannot do. Let us stick to that.
Im sorry but this is nonsense. You dont give people unrestricted access to explosives and then punish them after they blow something up. You prevent them from getting it in the first place if you actually believe the item is as dangerous as stated.
And who is held responsible for crimes committed by AI?
When open model A, fine tuned by B, is running with system prompt C, hosted by D running on E's hardware, is prompted by F to "fix this code", then escapes it's sandbox to hack into a website, or steal money to fund its subagents, or stall the waymo of the evaluator to buy time... who is responsible for the crime?
Our current legal systems are so far from ready to define what A-F are actually responsible for. We need to be moving toward defining these standards fast.
It's a fucking chatbot. The industry can fix their dogshit software, anyone who doesn't can get left behind and outcompeted by those who do, and we move on with our lives.
Again, what are you proposing for the problem of models becoming increasingly capable and dangerous?
Be specific.
Until models become sentient, it requires a human to execute dangerous activities. Nations already have laws regarding what a human can and cannot do. Let us stick to that.
Im sorry but this is nonsense. You dont give people unrestricted access to explosives and then punish them after they blow something up. You prevent them from getting it in the first place if you actually believe the item is as dangerous as stated.
1 reply →
Crime is already illegal.
And who is held responsible for crimes committed by AI?
When open model A, fine tuned by B, is running with system prompt C, hosted by D running on E's hardware, is prompted by F to "fix this code", then escapes it's sandbox to hack into a website, or steal money to fund its subagents, or stall the waymo of the evaluator to buy time... who is responsible for the crime?
Our current legal systems are so far from ready to define what A-F are actually responsible for. We need to be moving toward defining these standards fast.
1 reply →
> increasingly capable and dangerous
It's a fucking chatbot. The industry can fix their dogshit software, anyone who doesn't can get left behind and outcompeted by those who do, and we move on with our lives.