← Back to context

Comment by CaptWorld

1 month ago

Western colonialism is better than eastern colonialism tho. Look at the Russian orgs in Africa.

Single counterexample for single counterexample: Belgium's Leopold - not sure if Western colonialism is so much better (and notice I didn't even bring up "western India")

  • Not so much better but better in general compared to the middle eastern/eastern colonialism.. westerners have good competiton that the atrocities will be self corrected by itself but middle eastern/eastern colonies needed external western support like Korean war, hiroshima/nagasaki.. main example I can think of opposite is china under deng but there too deng had become relatively capitalist to fix the issues.

Better for whom? Certainly not the colonised...

  • Yeah for the ones who get colonized, western ones were better than eastern ones. Japanese ones would've made Britishers look like kids when they were occupying eastern India.

    • You just put Russia and Japan as "Eastern"; they have nothing to do with each (and I would consider both as more Western than Eastern regarding imperial/colonial matters) other nor with China. China is a massive country that has always been massive and rich. Their style is more like the tribute systems they had before, as it is being observed in the BRI and other projects.

      8 replies →

    • You know the British invented the concentration camp in Africa, right?

      We're told a relatively benign version of our history. You kinda have to travel to the countries involved to get the real version.

      2 replies →