← Back to context

Comment by monooso

11 hours ago

This is a terrible analogy.

It's quite clear that the author means AI writing is now good enough to cause confusion and speculation as to whether a given piece of writing was human-authored.

The confusion and speculation caused by your nude transit adventure is about what the hell you're doing and why.

> now good enough to cause confusion and speculation

since when is "confusion and speculation" an indicator of quality/goodness?

  • Logic failure.

    > maybe LLMs are seen to write as well as humans because most humans have poor reading comprehension skills?

    Whoa, ironic.