← Back to context Comment by IsTom 1 day ago And still that requires X to not be particularly large. It could conceivably be in ballpark of BB(40). 4 comments IsTom Reply AnimalMuppet 1 day ago You, sir, have a very different definition of "not particularly large" than I do! Sharlin 1 day ago To be fair, BB(40) is smaller than almost all positive integers. db48x 1 day ago It’s practically zero, in fact. jonathrg 1 day ago This feels like saying there are probably hundreds of stars in the universe
AnimalMuppet 1 day ago You, sir, have a very different definition of "not particularly large" than I do! Sharlin 1 day ago To be fair, BB(40) is smaller than almost all positive integers. db48x 1 day ago It’s practically zero, in fact.
Sharlin 1 day ago To be fair, BB(40) is smaller than almost all positive integers. db48x 1 day ago It’s practically zero, in fact.
You, sir, have a very different definition of "not particularly large" than I do!
To be fair, BB(40) is smaller than almost all positive integers.
It’s practically zero, in fact.
This feels like saying there are probably hundreds of stars in the universe