← Back to context Comment by logicallee 18 hours ago if you did that in the web interface, could you share the chat? I'd be interested to read it. 5 comments logicallee Reply inferencecoder 17 hours ago https://chatgpt.com/share/6a6f09ff-2830-83ea-9578-de3016cfae... logicallee 15 hours ago thanks for sharing.When I read your original comment, I was thinking you had just asked it to evaluate the article. (Like just "evaluate this article" or something.)I don't think anything anyone (or any AI) has ever written or published (including Sol itself) wouldn't be torn apart by the prompt you gave though. inferencecoder 15 hours ago I think it's fair to expect an extensive review of an article before publishing. Not everything has a set of serious flaws. 2 replies →
inferencecoder 17 hours ago https://chatgpt.com/share/6a6f09ff-2830-83ea-9578-de3016cfae... logicallee 15 hours ago thanks for sharing.When I read your original comment, I was thinking you had just asked it to evaluate the article. (Like just "evaluate this article" or something.)I don't think anything anyone (or any AI) has ever written or published (including Sol itself) wouldn't be torn apart by the prompt you gave though. inferencecoder 15 hours ago I think it's fair to expect an extensive review of an article before publishing. Not everything has a set of serious flaws. 2 replies →
logicallee 15 hours ago thanks for sharing.When I read your original comment, I was thinking you had just asked it to evaluate the article. (Like just "evaluate this article" or something.)I don't think anything anyone (or any AI) has ever written or published (including Sol itself) wouldn't be torn apart by the prompt you gave though. inferencecoder 15 hours ago I think it's fair to expect an extensive review of an article before publishing. Not everything has a set of serious flaws. 2 replies →
inferencecoder 15 hours ago I think it's fair to expect an extensive review of an article before publishing. Not everything has a set of serious flaws. 2 replies →
https://chatgpt.com/share/6a6f09ff-2830-83ea-9578-de3016cfae...
thanks for sharing.
When I read your original comment, I was thinking you had just asked it to evaluate the article. (Like just "evaluate this article" or something.)
I don't think anything anyone (or any AI) has ever written or published (including Sol itself) wouldn't be torn apart by the prompt you gave though.
I think it's fair to expect an extensive review of an article before publishing. Not everything has a set of serious flaws.
2 replies →