← Back to context Comment by matchbok3 10 hours ago [flagged] 3 comments matchbok3 Reply InsideOutSanta 10 hours ago You need to be more specific than that if you want to convince people. As far as I can tell, the title is factually correct; if it's not, I'd like to hear your argument. cowsandmilk 10 hours ago Both halves of the title are true statements. WarmWash 10 hours ago Unfortunately you can construct just about any narrative using true statements. Omission of facts is usually the damning trait of dishonesty.
InsideOutSanta 10 hours ago You need to be more specific than that if you want to convince people. As far as I can tell, the title is factually correct; if it's not, I'd like to hear your argument.
cowsandmilk 10 hours ago Both halves of the title are true statements. WarmWash 10 hours ago Unfortunately you can construct just about any narrative using true statements. Omission of facts is usually the damning trait of dishonesty.
WarmWash 10 hours ago Unfortunately you can construct just about any narrative using true statements. Omission of facts is usually the damning trait of dishonesty.
You need to be more specific than that if you want to convince people. As far as I can tell, the title is factually correct; if it's not, I'd like to hear your argument.
Both halves of the title are true statements.
Unfortunately you can construct just about any narrative using true statements. Omission of facts is usually the damning trait of dishonesty.