"Bootleg" is a meaningless word in this context, so I ignored it. You can't "bootleg" an open-source product; you can only branch it, which is completely legitimate.
I'm arguing against the actual point you made. You made the pedantic argument about "bootlegs" to distract from my argument. Now you've also decided to insult me.
To what end? Do you think that kind of approach convinces anyone?
There is no "fake android," either. Your whole argument is based on two false premises.
"Bootleg" is a meaningless word in this context, so I ignored it. You can't "bootleg" an open-source product; you can only branch it, which is completely legitimate.
So pedantic, you must be fun at parties. Or maybe are you arguing for the sake of arguing? Fake Android if it suits you better.
I'm arguing against the actual point you made. You made the pedantic argument about "bootlegs" to distract from my argument. Now you've also decided to insult me.
To what end? Do you think that kind of approach convinces anyone?
There is no "fake android," either. Your whole argument is based on two false premises.
3 replies →