← Back to context Comment by mpalmer 8 hours ago The README is slop, so I truly don't care. 3 comments mpalmer Reply nozzlegear 7 hours ago I don't like sloppy readmes either, but this one doesn't seem that. It's verbose but it's just documenting the API. There's no obvious LLMisms like "Why you should use this (the honest part)" or "Debouncing (the part that matters)". game_the0ry 8 hours ago Most people can't tell the difference. Entertain the possibility that you might be one of them. infinite_spin 8 hours ago > Don't be curmudgeonly. Thoughtful criticism is fine, but please don't be rigidly or generically negative.
nozzlegear 7 hours ago I don't like sloppy readmes either, but this one doesn't seem that. It's verbose but it's just documenting the API. There's no obvious LLMisms like "Why you should use this (the honest part)" or "Debouncing (the part that matters)".
game_the0ry 8 hours ago Most people can't tell the difference. Entertain the possibility that you might be one of them.
infinite_spin 8 hours ago > Don't be curmudgeonly. Thoughtful criticism is fine, but please don't be rigidly or generically negative.
I don't like sloppy readmes either, but this one doesn't seem that. It's verbose but it's just documenting the API. There's no obvious LLMisms like "Why you should use this (the honest part)" or "Debouncing (the part that matters)".
Most people can't tell the difference. Entertain the possibility that you might be one of them.
> Don't be curmudgeonly. Thoughtful criticism is fine, but please don't be rigidly or generically negative.